As a result of the ongoing global pandemic, the ability to resource for maintenance execution has become a challenge for many companies and has resulted in a significant increase in maintenance backlog.
When there is a bow-wave of work to manage, it is crucial to look for opportunities to prioritize and liquidate work effectively, based on risk and capacity.
A backlog prioritization model or study will determine the risks associated with delaying the work further and will facilitate the decision-making process to determine which work orders should be executed as a priority. Once this has been established, companies can apply execution techniques to liquidate the maintenance in the most efficient and effective way possible.
In this blog, Add Energy’s Senior Consultant, Emeka Onuh discusses how routing, sequencing, and packaging maintenance work orders can make maintenance execution much more efficient, and the profound effects it can have on improving plant and system availability, maintenance team productivity as well as safety.
While most organisations utilize these methods to some degree, they are often disjointed or misunderstood. We recommend viewing this as a combined strategy, with all three elements being reviewed and implemented, to get the most value for your business. Here are some of his top tips on how to successfully implement all three methods.
Routing maintenance is when you group short duration jobs for like equipment, usually within proximity to each other. This is beneficial for four main reasons:
- Time is optimized, so engineers spend more of their day actually executing maintenance
- You only need to raise one permit to do this work. This reduces overheads related to multiple permits, for example administrative time or wasted effort on paperwork that is not required
- One work order will be generated for multiple equipment and will only need to be signed off once, reducing administrative burden
- It will ultimately help you to achieve your PM compliance KPI as well as reducing overdue maintenance, as it makes the work easier to execute
There are a couple of rules or tips I would recommend when it comes to routing your maintenance:
- Only short jobs that are around 15-30 minutes per equipment (e.g., emergency lighting function test, gas detector function test, vibration monitoring, etc.) should be put into a route.
- If a job has a longer duration, a separate job should be created per equipment, to minimize the size of the job
- Do not limit yourself to routes that can only be carried out within a shift, as this will just cause more jobs to be generated in your system and ultimately more paperwork
- Ensure you plan supplementary jobs and resources (e.g., scaffolding, rigging, lagging, etc.) in advance to ensure there is enough time to complete the supplementary jobs before the main job can proceed
Sequencing maintenance is focused on developing a synchronized schedule for multiple jobs for one equipment.
There are three scenarios, and I have provided examples of each below…
1. SUPERSEDE AND SUPPRESS:
- There is a three-monthly oil level check job on an engine, as well as a yearly oil replacement
- When the yearly oil replacement is due, the three-monthly oil level check will also be due
- The oil replacement job would supersede the oil level check job, as an oil check would no longer be required if an oil replacement job is being carried out
- The oil replacement job work instructions would detail how to carry out the oil replacement but not mention anything about an oil level check
- Therefore, the oil level check job would be suppressed, and no work order generated whenever the oil replacement job is due
2. SUPPRESS ONLY:
- There is a monthly visual inspection of a pump, as well as a three-monthly function test
- When the three-monthly function test is due, the monthly visual inspection will also be due
- The function test job would not supersede the visual inspection job, as carrying out a function test requires a visual inspection to also be carried out
- The function test job work instructions would mention how to carry out the function test and visual inspection
- The visual inspection job would be suppressed, and no work order generated whenever the function test is due, but the visual inspection would be carried out as part of the function test job work instructions
3. DO NOT SUPERSEDE OR SUPPRESS:
- There is a three-monthly vibration analysis on a pump and a six-monthly performance test
- When the six-monthly performance test is due, the three-monthly vibration analysis will also be due
- The performance test job would not supersede the vibration analysis job, as carrying out a performance test is different to vibration analysis, which will also need to be done
- The performance test job work instructions would mention how to carry out the performance test but would not mention anything about the vibration analysis
- The vibration analysis job would not be suppressed, and the work order would be generated whenever the performance test is due
Controlling when jobs are and are not generated and what the content of job work instructions should contain will result in an optimized maintenance program.
I have a couple of fundamental rules I advise around sequencing maintenance:
- You can only sequence maintenance for jobs with frequencies that divide into each other, for example work that is done every 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months. So, jobs that are 1, 2 and 5 yearly’s can’t be set up in a sequence
- For a suppress only scenario - if job 1 is being suppressed by job 2, it’s very important that job 2’s work instructions include job 1
Packaging maintenancePackaging can be used to maintain different types of equipment at the same time across a defined boundary, like a package or system. Examples of such boundaries include:
- A vessel including the instrumentation, pumps, PSVs, motors and heaters
- A pump package including the pump, gearbox, electric motor, and circuit breaker
Let us expand this further by looking at pump maintenance for a job that requires the pump power to be turned off:
- As you will be turning the power off to make things safe, you could maintain all the electrical equipment on that circuit (e.g., circuit breaker and electric motor) together with the pump and gearbox
- Although this package maintenance will cover lots of equipment across multiple jobs, it is a highly efficient way to organize your maintenance.
- A production critical pump should not be taken offline multiple times to execute maintenance on different pieces of equipment linked to the pump - as this will cause lots of downtime
- It should be taken offline only once, with all related equipment maintained
By improving system availability, this will save money on unnecessary downtime and increase the maintenance team’s productivity.
There is a balance to be struck when packaging maintenance. Packaging can be overused and can make a maintenance programme very rigid and difficult to change. We have worked with some clients who have overpackaged, and we have had to reverse some of that into smaller blocks.
My advice for maintenance packaging is:
- Review a list of major equipment packages or systems that are critical to production and package those first
- Do not assign the same priority to all jobs in a maintenance package by:
- Assessing the maintenance priority of each job in a package on its own merit
- Ensure safety critical jobs are prioritized if part of a package, so they are not downgraded to being production or business critical priority
- Ensure packaged maintenance jobs have long lead times, so they are visible in the system months in advance and can be planned correctly
- Ensure all supplementary jobs, spares and resources are planned in advance to allow effective execution of the packaged maintenance
- Ensure your weekly maintenance KPIs factor in jobs that can take longer than a week, so they are not skewed
To learn more about how Add Energy can support your maintenance optimization initiatives here.